[c-nsp] route-target import on non-leaking PEs
Jason Lixfeld
jason at lixfeld.ca
Thu Dec 13 09:47:04 EST 2012
On 2012-12-13, at 9:23 AM, Phil Mayers <p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
> On 13/12/12 14:15, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
>>
>> On 2012-12-13, at 4:29 AM, Adam Vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk> wrote:
>>
>>> Using common RD in a vrf is asking for trouble if route-reflection is used.
>>>
>>> Let's say you have two PEs advertising default for vrf inet -if you use RRs
>>> to spread the routes throughout the backbone -RRs will only advertise one
>>> (best path)default route to all PEs.
>>> Now with unique RD per PE RRs will consider default form each PE as a unique
>>> route sending both to all PEs.
>>> Than you are ready for fast convergence.
>>> adam
>>
>> Hold on, are you saying that within a single VRF, you can actually use more than one RD?
>
> Yes. In fact, that's *required* if you want to do multi-path.
I seem to do multi-path just fine with maximum-paths ibgp 2 on my RR clients inside a VRF that sees a default sourced from two different RRs. Said VRF has a common RD between the two PEs.
How is that different?
> route target controls what gets "into" a VRF. RD is just a unique value that prefixes the route. It can be completely different.
That's what I thought. So I don't understand what the benefit would be to have PE'centric RDs if the ultimate goal is to treat the prefixes exactly the same way you'd treat prefixes if they weren't inside a VRF at all and were all just floating around in the global table; just like before all the L3VPN kung-fu started making sense.
> FWIW we use the convention of:
>
> xxx:N
>
> ...where N is the last octet of the routers loopback, so the RD is different on each router.
>
> There are differing opinions about the wisdom of this strategy - see here, for example:
>
> http://blog.ioshints.info/2012/07/bgp-route-replication-in-mplsvpn-pe.html
Thanks for this! I've been looking around for some good documentation sources. Clearly I need some subject matter edjamacation.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list