[c-nsp] route-target import on non-leaking PEs
Phil Mayers
p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk
Thu Dec 13 10:12:09 EST 2012
On 13/12/12 15:04, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
>
> On 2012-12-13, at 9:56 AM, Phil Mayers <p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> On 13/12/12 14:47, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes. In fact, that's *required* if you want to do multi-path.
>>>
>>> I seem to do multi-path just fine with maximum-paths ibgp 2 on my
>>> RR clients inside a VRF that sees a default sourced from two
>>> different RRs. Said VRF has a common RD between the two PEs.
>>>
>>> How is that different?
>>
>> Well, AIUI multipath *ought* to require unique RDs. Obviously not;
>> I wonder how that's working for you?
>
> So based on the link you posted previously, which I am currently
> making my way through, what's happening is on my production network
> where this multi-path stuff is actually working, I'm using XR as my
> RRs, which has add-path support.
Presumably the RR clients have add-path too (it's needed at both ends)?
Other explanations might be that by chance one RR had advertised one
path and the other RR another path.
But yes, my original email should have been more specific: unless you
have add-paths, unique RD is required for multipath.
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list