[c-nsp] 7600 layer 2 local switching: EVC to SVI

Tassos Chatzithomaoglou achatz at forthnetgroup.gr
Sat Feb 4 03:36:16 EST 2012


Similar to this case, is there a way (or any future plans) to connect an EVC directly to a 
VFI?
Currently i'm using EVC => SVI => VFI, but i would like to avoid the intermediate step, 
something that ASR9k can already do.

--
Tassos


Jason Lixfeld wrote on 3/2/2012 23:24:
> Ah-so.  This worked like a charm.  Thanks Arie (and other off-list replies that eluded to the same thing).
>
> On 2012-02-03, at 2:45 PM, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
>
>> Jason,
>>
>> The local connect option ("connect ..." CLI) is used to connect 2 EVCs
>> together, without a shared SVI between them.
>> This is basically the local alternative of a p2p xconnect.
>>
>> If you want to use local switching, through an SVI (mac learning etc,
>> but allows also using non-EVC access ports), you just use the
>> "bridge-domain VLAN-ID" command inside both EVCs.
>>
>> Arie
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason Lixfeld
>> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 20:37
>> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: [c-nsp] 7600 layer 2 local switching: EVC to SVI
>>
>> I'm planning to upgrade a 7600/Sup720 from 12.2(33)SRC4 to 12.2(33)SRE5
>> and in the process migrate some carrier connections to EVCs which will
>> require layer 2 local switching to connect the locally significant VLAN
>> ID of the EFP to the global VLAN.
>>
>> The command set between SRC and SRE seems to differ somewhat and I'm
>> having a hard time getting EVC to SVI based local switching working.  On
>> another 7600, I'm running an engineering build of SRE that was provided
>> to me by my SE to test a commit for an outstanding bug.  I was hoping
>> this other device and engineering build would be adequate to use as an
>> SRE test bed.  The engineering build seems to be based on the Advanced
>> Enterprise Services feature set, not the Advanced IP Services feature
>> set that we will actually be using.
>>
>> I'm trying to lab up the EVC to SVI local switching config, but it's
>> giving me problems and I'm not sure if it's the engineering build that
>> is causing me grief or if what I want to do just won't work.  As you can
>> imagine, I'd like to try and get this all proved out ahead of time so
>> there are no gotchas during the upgrade.
>>
>> The issue I'm running into in the engineering build is that the parser
>> is expecting a service instance identifier after the VLAN identifier,
>> which doesn't jive; can't make an EFP on an SVI:
>>
>> 7600#sh run int g7/0/0
>> Building configuration...
>>
>> Current configuration : 238 bytes
>> !
>> interface GigabitEthernet7/0/0
>> description NNI Testing Port
>> mtu 9216
>> no ip address
>> speed 1000
>> mls qos trust dscp
>> no cdp enable
>> service instance 100 ethernet
>>   encapsulation dot1q 100
>>   rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
>> !
>> end
>>
>> 7600#sh run int vlan 100
>> Building configuration...
>>
>> Current configuration : 40 bytes
>> !
>> interface Vlan100
>> no ip address
>> end
>>
>> 7600#conf t
>> Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
>> 7600(config)#connect test gi7/0/0 100 vlan 100 ?
>>   <1-4294967295>   Service Instance Identifier
>>
>> 7600(config)#
>>
>> The SRC parser seems to think different:
>>
>> 7600#sh run int g7/0/17
>> Building configuration...
>>
>> Current configuration : 227 bytes
>> !
>> interface GigabitEthernet7/0/17
>> description NNI Testing Port
>> mtu 9216
>> no ip address
>> mls qos trust dscp
>> no cdp enable
>> service instance 100 ethernet
>>   encapsulation dot1q 100
>>   rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
>> !
>> end
>>
>> 7600#sh run int vlan 100
>> Building configuration...
>>
>> Current configuration : 40 bytes
>> !
>> interface Vlan100
>> no ip address
>> end
>>
>> 7600#conf t
>> Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
>> 7600(config)#connect test gi7/0/17 100 vlan 100 ?
>>   <1-4294967295>   Service Instance Identifier
>>   interworking    Configure Interworking Type for this connection
>>
>> 7600(config)#connect test gi7/0/17 100 vlan 100 interworking ethernet
>> 7600(config-connection)#
>>
>> Anyone know if production SRE5 Advanced IP Services is similar to what
>> works in SRC?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list