[c-nsp] Quick 6500 question...
Andriy Bilous
andriy.bilous at gmail.com
Tue Feb 7 17:29:14 EST 2012
Also non-E 3-slot chassis can't host 67xx modules.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Bill Wade <billwade98 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Also the 6513E backplane provides 80Gb (dual fabric channels) for each slot whereas the 6513 is limited to 40Gb in slots 1-8.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Phil Mayers <p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk>
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 12:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Quick 6500 question...
>
> On 07/02/12 15:30, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Jeff Kell wrote:
>>
>>> Quick reality check...
>>>
>>> Is the difference in the E-series chassis only in available power? Has
>>> nothing to do
>>> with backplane bandwidth?
>>
>> The non-E chassis only has 40G per slot to the backplane, where the E
>> chassis has 80G per slot. IIRC the Sup2T and 6900-series blades will
>> only work in an E chassis. I don't have any Sup2Ts or 6900s to verify that.
>
> This is correct.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list