[c-nsp] TACACS vs RADIUS

Webster, Andy ANDY.WEBSTER at illinois.gov
Mon Feb 27 17:30:09 EST 2012


Cisco has a really good page detailing the differences between TACACS and RADIUS at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk59/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094e99.shtml#comparing.

bye,
Andy

________________________________________
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold [xenophage at godshell.com]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 2:49 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] TACACS vs RADIUS

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi there,

        I'm contemplating switching from TACACS to RADIUS for admin
authentication on switches and routers.  In part this is so I can
reduce the number of services that have to be maintained, and part has
to do with integration with our existing authentication system.

        Can someone comment on whether RADIUS is a viable replacement for
TACACS?  Will I end up missing some major feature of TACACS?  Will
using RADIUS end up reducing security?

Thanks,

- --
- ---------------------------
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
xenophage at godshell.com
- ---------------------------

"Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.\"
- - Niven's Inverse of Clarke's Third Law
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk9L7G8ACgkQO80o6DJ8Uvlc7ACdGbhjITxx5PaCFSBDsO7PrR7P
O1QAoI8vC6OmNxNPYX/2+R838Zyz9qm/
=WJfR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list