[c-nsp] channel fails when using sup 10g port ?
Christopher.Marget at usc-bt.com
Christopher.Marget at usc-bt.com
Thu Jan 5 15:26:30 EST 2012
There's a "10g-only mode" for the supervisor ports on the Sup720-10GE.
mls qos 10g-only
This mode disables the 1Gb/s ports, and enables 8q4t ingress and 1p7q4t egress queueing on the 10Gb/s ports, which is the same as the ports on the 6708 card.
If queueing is the only failed consistency parameter, then enabling this mode might allow the EtherChannel to come up without disabling the consistency check.
I haven't tried it.
/chris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David Prall
> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 1:28 PM
> To: 'Chuck Church'; 'Jeffrey G. Fitzwater'
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] channel fails when using sup 10g port ?
>
> Is QoS configured? Have to configure qos inconsistency, "no mls qos channel-
> consistency"
>
> David
>
> --
> http://dcp.dcptech.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chuck Church
> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 1:13 PM
> To: 'Jeffrey G. Fitzwater'
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] channel fails when using sup 10g port ?
>
> Show int capability might shed some light on what the interface differences are.
>
> Chuck
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeffrey G. Fitzwater
> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 11:55 AM
> To: Andrew Miehs
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] channel fails when using sup 10g port ?
>
> I really have to understand why the 16A channel gets built.
>
> All the trunking and port configs are correct. If they were wrong the logs
> "should" show me what was broke. Santa checked his list twice, I did it 10 times.
>
>
> I do have the same config working, using a sup 10g port on another router as a
> channel member, but it connects to nexus 7018.
> In the broken case, both ends use a sup10g port and another X6708 port, but
> they are not paired to same type at other end (sup-10g to sup-10g) vs (sup-10g
> to X6708-10g ) not that it should matter.
>
> So the only unique thing, is both ends are sup-720-10g in the broken case.
> Its not the LACP proto since I tried MODE ON with same problem.
> What is also odd is when I disable one port of the channel, and do the "show
> ether channel 16 summ", only the 16 is present with both port (one DOWN).
> the 16A is gone.
> As soon was I enable the other port the 16A shows up.
>
> Whats odd is there is nothing in the log telling why the channel did not come up
> correctly instead of this 16 and 16A .
>
> Could it have something to do with using both 10G ports on the same sup, but
> for different functions? One is for this channel the other is just an access port.
>
> Jeff
>
> On Jan 5, 2012, at 10:48 , Andrew Miehs wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Jeffrey G. Fitzwater
> <jfitz at princeton.edu<mailto:jfitz at princeton.edu>> wrote:
> I am trying to use the sup720-10G 10g port and another 10g port on a 6708-10G
> module as an ether-channel pair.
>
> ...
> Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
> ------+-------------+-----------+---------------------------------------
> ------+-------------+-----------+----
> ----
> 16 Po16(SU) LACP Te13/1(P)
> 16 Po16A(SU) LACP Te7/4(P)
>
> -----------------------------------
>
> I do not see this issue on a SXI5 box - see below.
>
> You may want to try:
>
> default interface Te13/1
> default interface Te7/4
>
> no inter port16
> no inter port16a
>
> interface Te13/1
> channel-group 16 mode passive
> interface Te7/4
> channel-group 16 mode passive
>
> - and then see what "show etherchannel summary" outputs...
>
>
> ==== example config
>
> gv(config-if)#do show etherch summary
> Flags: D - down P - bundled in port-channel
> I - stand-alone s - suspended
> H - Hot-standby (LACP only)
> R - Layer3 S - Layer2
> U - in use N - not in use, no aggregation
> f - failed to allocate aggregator
>
> M - not in use, no aggregation due to minimum links not met
> m - not in use, port not aggregated due to minimum links not met
> u - unsuitable for bundling
> d - default port
>
> w - waiting to be aggregated
> Number of channel-groups in use: 1
> Number of aggregators: 1
>
> Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
> ------+-------------+-----------+---------------------------------------
> ------+-------------+-----------+----
> ----
> 16 Po16(RD) LACP Te4/16(D) Te6/5(D)
>
> gv(config-if)#
>
> interface TenGigabitEthernet4/16
> shutdown
> channel-group 16 mode passive
> end
>
> interface TenGigabitEthernet6/5
> shutdown
> channel-group 16 mode passive
> end
>
> gv#show version | i SX
> Cisco IOS Software, s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9_WAN-
> M),
> Version 12.2(33)SXI5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
> ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(17r)SX7, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) System
> image file is "sup-bootdisk:s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI5.bin"
> gv#
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list