[c-nsp] forced path MPLS tunnel question
Mark Tinka
mtinka at globaltransit.net
Tue Jan 17 23:44:23 EST 2012
On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 12:01:27 AM Gert Doering
wrote:
> For the "verbatim!" paths, having the point-to-point
> next-hops listed (and having "mpls traffic-eng tunnels"
> on the interface) seems to be sufficient - it's now
> working for a somewhat smaller-than-planned test rig,
> but it *is* working :-) (and I have learned something).
Gert, just so you know, when you're doing explicit routing
in MPLS-TE and your IGP (OSPF or IS-IS, if you do choose to
run them in the future) domains are multi-area (OSPF) or
multi-level (IS-IS), then you need to deploy Inter-Area
MPLS-TE.
Inter-Area MPLS-TE calls for a so-called Expanded Loose Hops
configuration, where nodes in an LSP path are defined
"loosely" as opposed to "strictly" ("loosely" means that
routers along the path will need to determine the best path
through which to signal the LSP, while "strictly" means the
LSP is signaled specifically on the defined path, whether it
is the best or not).
Now, the reason I'm writing this is to warn you of the
differences in deploying Inter-Area MPLS-TE between IOS/IOS
XE and IOS XR.
In IOS and IOS XE, defining the physical interface IP
addresses in your ERO (Explicit Route Object), just like
you're doing now, will work. But in IOS XR, the only
supported addressing in the ERO are the Router ID's, i.e.,
the Loopback interfaces.
If you try to define the ERO in IOS XR with the physical
interface address, the LSP won't be signaled.
PS: in case you're wondering, strict ERO's are not supported
for Inter-Area MPLS-TE.
PS: for us, some of the MPLS services we run do not like
Inter-Area MPLS-TE, so we maintain a flat Level-2 IS-IS
domain (or in the OSFP case, this would be a flat Area 0
across the entire backbone).
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20120118/31860998/attachment.sig>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list