[c-nsp] 7600 Owners, failure stats wanted
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Sat Jan 21 05:37:03 EST 2012
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 07:29:26PM -0500, Jon Lewis wrote:
> We do this with single supervisors, and a full redundant identically
> configured chassis. Customer's who care get a link to each chassis.
Same here. Not that much hardware outage over the last years (one
Sup720-10G arrived DOA, one Sup32 went bad, two or three 61xx line
cards) - but there's IOS upgrades, and sometimes bad IOS versions,
so having separate chassis for redundancy (with different IOS versions)
is very useful.
(... and this is reason #1 why we are not using VSS)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20120121/098ab1a7/attachment.sig>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list