[c-nsp] 7600 Owners, failure stats wanted

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Sat Jan 21 05:37:03 EST 2012


Hi,

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 07:29:26PM -0500, Jon Lewis wrote:
> We do this with single supervisors, and a full redundant identically 
> configured chassis.  Customer's who care get a link to each chassis.

Same here.  Not that much hardware outage over the last years (one 
Sup720-10G arrived DOA, one Sup32 went bad, two or three 61xx line 
cards) - but there's IOS upgrades, and sometimes bad IOS versions, 
so having separate chassis for redundancy (with different IOS versions)
is very useful.

(... and this is reason #1 why we are not using VSS)

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20120121/098ab1a7/attachment.sig>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list