[c-nsp] Multicast Issue
Danail Petrov
danail.petrov at yahoo.com
Mon Jun 4 06:11:14 EDT 2012
Hi there,
A few questions:
1. What IGMP version is used?
2. What kind is the platform - 65/76 and if so - what modules are used.
If this is an IGMPv3 - there is a well known issue with it. I should search a little for that but S,G channels are not properly snooped by the switch, which results in broadcast manner you described.
BR,
Dani
On Jun 4, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
>
> Hi all , thanks for all replies
> Seemingly after i connected a laptop with wireshark , there seem a lot of broadcast which reach as well unused ports
> Bandwidth supposed to be 5M for each stream requested , so is it possibly CPE ?
> We have configured IGMP quierer on the Core Switch
>
> BR,
>
> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 23:25:22 -0700
> From: td_miles at yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Multicast Issue
> To: eng_mssk at hotmail.com; matt at mcadory.info
> CC: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>
> Badly configured QoS perhaps ?
>
> What about limitation on how much of the link can be used for multicast ?
> Can you try adding incremental streams in smaller amounts to find at what point you have too much traffic ?
> Have you graphed the usage on the link to verify that the amount of bandwidth being used is indeed what you think it might be ?
> There are about 101 different reasons it could be performing badly, we're sort of just throwing suggestions out there.
>
>
> regards,Tony.
>
>
> From: Mohammad Khalil <eng_mssk at hotmail.com>
> To: matt at mcadory.info
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Sunday, 3 June 2012 3:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Multicast Issue
>
>
> Hi , the issue seems not BW issue as according to the specifications , each TV is supposed to consume 5M
> So any ideas?
>
> BR,
> Mohammad
>
>> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 23:44:31 -0500
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp]
> Multicast Issue
>> From: matt at mcadory.info
>> To: eng_mssk at hotmail.com
>> CC: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>
>> http://www.cardinalpeak.com/blog/?p=1054 is a good explanation of bit
>> rate measurement process using WS. Use that to validate your expected
>> 8Mbps stream rate. Also validate with your DSLAM operator that the
>> 24Mbps you quote isn't total video and IPTV, but dedicated to video
>> (or at least dedicated when video is flowing) to get your ~3 streams
>> worth.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Mohammad Khalil <eng_mssk at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The downstream is configured to be 24 M but the upstream is configured to be 4M
>>> this is the current setup , so it is for sure bandwidth issue ?
>>>
>>>> From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu
>>>> To: eng_mssk at hotmail.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Multicast Issue
>>>> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:18:57 +0200
>>>> CC: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, May 30, 2012 08:14:20 AM Mohammad Khalil
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Actually its
> supposed for each stream to consume 8M
>>>>> should i try to increase the speed limits configured ?
>>>>
>>>> As this is VDSL, are you sure you're actually getting 24Mbps
>>>> into the house?
>>>>
>>>> We tested IPTv on VDSL using new copper across 50m - it was
>>>> a disaster.
>>>>
>>>> If you can, try increasing bandwidth and see if that helps.
>>>> But it definitely sounds like when you request a 2nd stream
>>>> and the picture develops block noise, you're starving the
>>>> link of bandwidth.
>>>>
>>>> Mark.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list