[c-nsp] WS-X6708-10G-3C and 3CXL and SUP720-3BXL

Lee Starnes lee.t.starnes at gmail.com
Tue Jun 12 17:53:58 EDT 2012


Fantastic! That is what I was looking for.

Thanks Joe.

-Lee

On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Joe Hamby <johamby at blomand.net> wrote:

> **
> I just put a 3cxl 6708 in a 7600 this morning.
>
> it operates at the 3bxl rates
>
> 1   48  CEF720 48 port 1000mb SFP              WS-X6748-SFP
>   2   48  CEF720 48 port 1000mb SFP              WS-X6748-SFP
>   3    8  CEF720 8 port 10GE with DFC            WS-X6708-10GE
>   5    2  Supervisor Engine 720 (Active)         WS-SUP720-3BXL
>   6    2  Supervisor Engine 720 (Hot)            WS-SUP720-3BXL
>
>
> 1  Distributed Forwarding Card WS-F6700-DFC3BXL   SAL11402RL6  5.3    Ok
>   2  Distributed Forwarding Card WS-F6700-DFC3BXL   JAF1226ADEL  5.4    Ok
>   3  Distributed Forwarding Card WS-F6700-DFC3CXL   SAL161288CF  1.7    Ok
>   5  Policy Feature Card 3       WS-F6K-PFC3BXL     SAL1102DGJY  1.8    Ok
>   5  MSFC3 Daughterboard         WS-SUP720          SAL1101CZST  2.6    Ok
>   6  Policy Feature Card 3       WS-F6K-PFC3BXL     SAL1102DK9Y  1.8    Ok
>   6  MSFC3 Daughterboard         WS-SUP720          SAL1102DNMK  2.6    Ok
>
>
> 00:00:36: DFC3: Currently running ROMMON from S (Gold) region
> Jun 12 06:31:11.772 CDT: %DIAG-SP-6-RUN_MINIMUM: Module 3: Running Minimal
> Diagnostics...
> Jun 12 06:31:33.697 CDT: %DIAG-SP-6-DIAG_OK: Module 3: Passed Online
> Diagnostics
> Jun 12 06:31:33.774 CDT: %OIR-SP-6-DOWNGRADE_EARL: Module 3 DFC installed
> is not identical to sy
> stem PFC and will perform at current system operating mode.
> Jun 12 06:31:34.550 CDT: %OIR-SP-6-INSCARD: Card inserted in slot 3,
> interfaces are now online
>
>
>
> On 6/12/2012 3:55 PM, Lee Starnes wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I was reading on the Cisco site that the WS-X6708-10G-3C and 3CXL are
> compatible with the SUP720-3BXL and will operate normally. I was wondering
> if anyone has done this and what the performance is like. I would hate to
> upgrade our SUPs if I don't have to as they are working just fine.
>
> These would be in 6509 chassis.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lee
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.nethttps://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list