[c-nsp] ASR9k for large scale NAT?

[Nick Hilliard]

On 05/03/2012 21:44, David Farje wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We currently have ASR 1006 with RP1 and ESP20, but it is running some
> things that are killing the memory.
> 1. Full internet routing table from 3 peers.
> 2. NAT
> 3. NAT logging via Netflow

not surprised it's bombing out on memory.  You could separate out the NAT
functionality from the transit router functionality here - e.g. 1 or more
routers acting as transit routers and then a NAT layer between that and
your customers.  That would certainly give you lots of breathing room.  You
could also put more DRAM into the ASR1k - the RP1 will take up to 4G.
Alternatively, you could upgrade to an RP2 and bump the RAM up to 16G.

I.e. lots of options without having to go to the expense of an asr9k.

Nick

> We are a small-to-medium sized ISP and we are looking for a cheap way to
> support many NAT translations.
> I would like to know if ASR9k can support NAT, but without the ISM module
> that offers CGN (carrier grade nat) but
> it's too much, and too expensive.
> 
> Or maybe other solutions?
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/