[c-nsp] ME3600 BGP Route-Maps and IPv6 (WAS: Re: preference on bgp route advertisements)

[Reuben Farrelly]

No - as opposed to having no route-map matching IPv6 at all.

So, if I have a route-map that (after my correction) actually matches an 
IPv6 route at the top of the route-map sequence and sets the community 
value of that IPv6 matched route, then it works as expected.

If I have a route-map that parses IPv6 routes, but does not match any 
IPv6 routes (no match ipv6 ... defined anywhere in any of the route-map 
sequence entries) then it matches on the first _IPv4_ route map entry 
and sets the community of that IPv6 route to the IPv4 match instead. 
That's the bug :)

Reuben


On 8/03/2012 2:48 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 07, 2012 06:01:41 AM Reuben Farrelly
> wrote:
>
>> Correction.  I made a mistake in my testing there...
>>
>> If I have:
>>
>> ipv6 prefix-list PERMIT-IPV6-ANY seq 10 permit ::/0 le 64
>>
>> Then yes the IPv6 specific route-map matches first and
>> the correct community is set.
>
> You mean as opposed to "... le 48"?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark.