[c-nsp] ISIS and MTU mismatch

Randy randy_94108 at yahoo.com
Sun Mar 25 15:34:32 EDT 2012



--- On Sun, 3/25/12, Jason Lixfeld <jason at lixfeld.ca> wrote:

> From: Jason Lixfeld <jason at lixfeld.ca>
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ISIS and MTU mismatch
> To: "Randy" <randy_94108 at yahoo.com>
> Cc: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Date: Sunday, March 25, 2012, 12:28 PM
> > Hello Jason,
> > I believe the routed-mtu size on SVI is still 1500
> despite system mtu being 1998
> > When you change default on 7600 to 9000 you are
> changing the routed-mtu size.
> > ./Randy
> 
> I thought about that, but the MTU on the SVI certainly
> follows the system MTU.  I checked that.  Although
> it would seem to make sense considering the SVI is
> technically a routed interface that the MTU should reflect
> that of the routed MTU, alas.


...so a "sh ip int vlan x" says ip mtu 1998?
I can understand "sh int vlan x" would reflect the system mtu.
./Randy



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list