[c-nsp] 7206 LNS/L2TP using HSRP

[ar]

Thanks Arie.

Any disadvantage of using HSRP compared to multiple initiate-to commands on the LAC?
I want HSRP due to the reason i can control who is the active and standby LNS.
LNS  is mine, while LAC is on the access provider side.

thanks



________________________________
 From: Arie Vayner (avayner) <avayner at cisco.com>
To: ar <ar_djp at yahoo.com>; cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2012 7:09 PM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 7206 LNS/L2TP using HSRP
 
Better use discrete IP addresses. Loopbacks are mostly recommended.
On your LAC you can specify multiple IPs (that can come from RADIUS...).

This would allow you to load share, running your LNSs in Act/Act mode...

Look here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk827/tk369/technologies_white_paper09186a00800a43e9.shtml#wp1002265 

Arie

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of ar
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 00:37
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: [c-nsp] 7206 LNS/L2TP using HSRP

Guys,


I'm planning to terminate L2TP to LNS using HSRP. 
So there will be LNS redundancy.
Is this possible?
I've read that terminating L2TP to the HSRP address has some issues.
 
Or better to use multiple initiate-to commands on the LAC?
Any other options for fail-over/redundancy?

thanks
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/