[c-nsp] DHCP & NAT router limitations

[JP Senior]

>If you are purely Ethernet then the cheapest Cisco solution would be an
ASA5505

Be aware that it's basically useless for more than a handful unique IP addresses (20 or so) without a Security plus license upgrade for the 5505.


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aled Morris
Sent: 30 May 2012 9:09 AM
To: Rens
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] DHCP & NAT router limitations

On 30 May 2012 11:17, Rens <rens at autempspourmoi.be> wrote:

> For a one day wifi event I'm looking which kind of router can be used 
> to deliver DHCP & NAT for 1000-2000 simultaneous users
>
> Total WAN capacity will be +- 50Mbps
>
> Would a 1841 or a 2811 be able to handle all this NAT/DHCP?
>
>
Neither of these would cope with 50Mbps even without the NAT.

If you are purely Ethernet then the cheapest Cisco solution would be an
ASA5505

I assume you've already got a wifi setup that can cope with 2,000 connections.

Aled
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged
subject matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact
the sender and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication,
e-mail communications may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized
parties. If you do not wish us to communicate with you by e-mail, please
notify us at your earliest convenience. In the absence of such
notification, your consent is assumed. Should you choose to allow us to
communicate by e-mail, we will not take any additional security measures
(such as encryption) unless specifically requested.