[c-nsp] 7200VXR G2 performance
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Thu Nov 8 15:32:15 EST 2012
On 08/11/2012 20:17, David Farrell wrote:
> Only today I was taking Nick's approach to eeking out 2 x 7204s w/ G2s for
> a few more weeks. I removed them from the DFZ and tore down around 120
> direct peering BGP sessions. We now send them 8 prefixes each, including
> default. TBH, this has had a negligible impact so I await the arrival of
> ASR1ks to replace these. That's said, there are some intense ACLs on the
> high traffic interfaces which could be rationalised somewhat. If there is
> time I might have a bash at this.
I should have said that the list was in order of priority. If you can
remove customers and traffic, you can bring down the load without reducing
functionality. Everything else involves a functionality / smartness
compromise.
But yeah, an npe-g2 has a limited amount of steam. Once you've run out,
that's kinda it.
Nick
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org
> <mailto:nick at foobar.org>> wrote:
>
> On 08/11/2012 06:13, Ali Sumsam wrote:
> > Any suggestion how can we lower the load or increase the power of the
> > router. We need a temporary solution for a couple of weeks.
> >
> > Besides, I think removing ACLs and limiting the traffic coming from
> > Aggregation(3560G) can help. Comments plz....
>
> Remove:
>
> - customers
> - traffic
> - ACLs
> - uRPF
> - Netflow
> - policy routing
> - full routing
> - more customers
>
> Nick
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> <mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list