[c-nsp] label-allocation-mode per-ce Operational experience
Saku Ytti
saku at ytti.fi
Wed Nov 14 10:05:44 EST 2012
On (2012-11-14 15:25 +0100), Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> Is anyone using label-allocation-mode per-ce instead of the default
> label-allocation-mode per-prefix in production mpls backbone please?
Sorry I read this too fast. I presumed 'per-ce' or 'per-vrf'.
If your options are 'per-ce' and 'per-prefix' I don't understand
difference. Since to me they mean the same thing, you have unique label
when ever you have unique need for L2 rewrite
Having different label for two prefixes going to same L2 rewrite makes no
sense to me and there is no point at all to use one. You're just wasting
labels without any benefits.
My previous email was about 'per-ce' and 'per-vrf' merits.
--
++ytti
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list