[c-nsp] loose uRPF on Sup720/3B

Jon Lewis jlewis at lewis.org
Wed Nov 14 11:55:30 EST 2012


On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Pete Templin wrote:

> On 11/14/12 3:45 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
>
>>   ip verify unicast source reachable-via any allow-default
>
>> so what is a "suppressed verification drop"?  And, much more important,
>> "will it still do that in hardware", or will loose-uRPF ("via any") punti
>> it into the software path for "some packets"?
>
> Brian gave a decent response, but because I'm drinking my morning coffee I 
> feel the urge to add another reply for you (since it'll delay my departure 
> for work).  A suppressed verification drop is a packet that would have 
> dropped  with 'ip verify unicast source reachable-via [any|rx]', but didn't 
> drop because you added options (which can be allow-default, allow-self-ping, 
> and/or an ACL to punch some additional holes).

So that suggests that the suppressed drops were suppressed by 
allow-default and that Gert doesn't have full routes on this device, which 
is a given since it's a non-XL 3B.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
  Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
  Atlantic Net                |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list