[c-nsp] RIPE 554, availability of required IPv6 features

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 02:32:59PM +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> Are my assumptions wrong? We're (in part politically) not allowed to
> require anything that only one or two vendors would be able to fulfill,
> though something that lives up to one of the three points above
> shouldn't be a problem.

This is an interesting problem.  If one vendor (out of a fairly small
group anyway) is listening and providing solutions, while everybody else
keeps stalling, what can you do...?

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20121124/c3b3bdf7/attachment.sig>