[c-nsp] RIPE 554, availability of required IPv6 features

[Phil Mayers]

On 26/11/12 12:23, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:02:58AM +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote:
>> And if we end up modifying the RFP to make the basic IPv6 support
>> optional we have hopefully at least sent a signal.
>
> Yes. The signal is "ignore mandatory IPv6 requirements - they will get
> dropped to optional anyway" - which is the partyline I hear from
> multiple vendors about IPv6 requirements in RFPs. They are very relaxed
> about those, and it shows unfortunately.

Ok. What's your suggestion then?