[c-nsp] ISR G2 Licenses - Permanent vs Right To Use

Steve McCrory SMcCrory at gcicom.net
Wed Nov 28 12:23:20 EST 2012


So are you saying that the distributor has not installed any license at
all as they are pretty adamant that they have and the Cisco EULA seems
to suggest that a RTU license is valid as long as you do actually
purchase a license

 

From: Blake Dunlap [mailto:ikiris at gmail.com] 
Sent: 28 November 2012 16:50
To: Brian Turnbow
Cc: Steve McCrory; cisco-nsp NSP
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ISR G2 Licenses - Permanent vs Right To Use

 

Right to use means they just turned on eval mode and let it go to honor
mode. If they had installed an actual license, it would show perm.

 

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Brian Turnbow <b.turnbow at twt.it> wrote:


> Hi Group,
>
>
> We've had a complaint from a customer that their security license on a
> 1941K9 is showing as Right To Use when they are expecting it to show
> Permanent:
>
>
>
> Index 2 Feature: securityk9
>
>          Period left: Life time
>
>          License Type: RightToUse
>
>          License State: Active, In Use
>
>          License Count: Non-Counted
>
>          License Priority: Low
>
>
>
> We've had this checked with our distributor who shipped us the router
pre-
> installed with the required license and they are happy that Right To
Use is
> correct. They even raised it with Cisco and they came back quoting the
> Wassenaar Arrangement.
>

>From what I've understood in the grand scheme of things... security can
come in two forms
1) bundled security router (direct from cisco)
2) ip base router + right to use security license (temporary or
perpetual)

In the first case you get

Index 2 Feature: securityk9
        Period left: Life time

        License Type: Permanent

        License State: Active, In Use
        License Count: Non-Counted

        License Priority: Medium

In the second case what you have.

Since the distributor "preinstalled the license" it seems to be an
ipbase router with perpetual right to use security.


Brian




>
>
> Can someone clear up the difference between the two terms as the Cisco
> literature on the subject is confusing and our customer is like a dog
with
> a bone over this.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Steven
>
>
>
> Steven McCrory
>
> Network Specialist
>
>
>
> GCI Com
>
> Unit 2
>
> Modwen Road
>
> Salford
>
> M5 3EZ
>
>
>
> Office:  0844 443 3537
>
> Fax:      0844 443 3540
>
> www.gcicom.net
>
<https://mail.ipi-group.co.uk/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.gcico
> m.net/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Steve McCrory
> Senior Network Engineer
>
> GCI Com
> Cedar Court Office Park
> Denby Dale Road
> Calder Grove
> Wakefield
> WF4 3QZ
>
> Office:   0844 443 3537
> Fax:      0844 443 3540
> http://www.gcicom.net/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



---
This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above.
As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information,
if you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to retain,
read,
copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.

Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this
e-mail.



_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

 


 
Steve McCrory
Senior Network Engineer
  
GCI Com
Cedar Court Office Park
Denby Dale Road
Calder Grove
Wakefield
WF4 3QZ
 
Office:   0844 443 3537
Fax:      0844 443 3540
http://www.gcicom.net/


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list