[c-nsp] IPv6 PE-CE

[Mohammad Khalil]

Hi all
For me I prefer static or BGP , but I like to test every possible solution available

Thanks

BR,
Mohammad

> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:34:00 -0700
> From: bep at whack.org
> To: saku at ytti.fi
> CC: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 PE-CE
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Saku Ytti wrote:
> > On (2012-10-17 17:11 +0300), Mohammad Khalil wrote:
> > 
> >> I was trying to implement OSPFv3 and EIGRP6 as the PE-CE in 6VPE
> >> deployment but seems IOS does not support that yet
> > 
> > Out of curiosity. Why are people choosing to run IGP in network
> > borders? Link-state is complex, expensive and poorly manageable (in
> > terms of filters/policies/route-map)
> > 
> 
> Customers are asking for and willing to pay for it????
> 
> 
> - -- 
> =========
> bep
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAlB/sOgACgkQE1XcgMgrtyZC3ACgzW24qhxTXolrM0OAEigekotk
> IQgAn0C/OWAdTH8uwXXDNs5NYNkoeEWi
> =Br+4
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/