[c-nsp] NAT capacity on 2801

[arulgobinath emmanuel]

Better to leave the nat on Firewall / otherwise i think even 7206 also will
boil down.

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:41 PM, García Fernández, Fernando <
Fernando.Garcia at tecnocom.es> wrote:

> Hello
>
> Actually we are using NAT, route maps with static translations on a 2801.
> The traffic has grown and we're near 50 mb/sec of NATed traffic and the CPU
> is near 100%.
>
> What platform can we use to handle this traffic?
>
> I tried to found a table in the cisco web site with capacities of the
> different routers regarding this feature but couldn't find it. Any pointer
> will be of help.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Fernando Garcia.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>