[c-nsp] Overflows During Microbursts on Cisco Switch

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 09:00:25AM -0500, Ge Moua wrote:
> +1 for:
> * get a reasonable switch
> 
> maybe something like a 2960-X (or higher) will provide for deeper 
> buffers during micro-burst use case.

As far as I have been told, the new E and X switches have the same amount
of buffers, because Cisco does not consider this to be a limitation.

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20121030/048c0e68/attachment.sig>