[c-nsp] ME3600x sub-interfaces

[Aaron]

Haven't y'all had to use this command often ?  I have.  Doesn't seem to work
without it in many scenarios...

"rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric"

...seems that for basic, single dot1q tag trunking, I've found that this
command is required.  Lemme know what you think.

However, in scenarios where I've plumed that service instance into an eompls
pw (vpws) and not a bridge domain, I have NOT had to use the rewrite ingress
tag pop trick....

...me3600x...

interface GigabitEthernet0/6
 switchport trunk allowed vlan none
 switchport mode trunk
service instance 491 ethernet
  encapsulation dot1q 491
  rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
  bridge-domain 491

interface Vlan491
 ip vrf forwarding two
 ip address 10.80.2.2 255.255.255.0
 standby 1 ip 10.80.2.1
 standby 1 priority 120
 standby 1 preempt delay minimum 60


...asr901...

interface GigabitEthernet0/5
 load-interval 30
 media-type sfp
 negotiation auto
 service-policy input pm
 service instance 1 ethernet
  encapsulation dot1q 3290
  xconnect 10.101.0.13 17 encapsulation mpls
   mtu 9206


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Pete Lumbis
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 3:47 PM
To: Eric A Louie
Cc: Cisco NSP
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x sub-interfaces

Eric,

To provide routing on a service instance, Jason is correct, you need to tie
it to a bridge-domain.

service instance 1 ethernet
 encapsulation dot1q 101
  bridge-domain 100
service instance 2 ethernet
  encapsulation dot1q 201
   bridge-domain 100

int vlan 100
 ip add 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

If you are new to service instances take a look at a doc I wrote on Cisco's
support forums to help explain how they work.

https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-21299

-Pete

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Eric A Louie <elouie at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Thanks Thomas.  That's definitely an option - it was my 2nd one.  The 
> plain old subinterfaces, like on a router, don't work on this platform,
apparently.
>
>  Much appreciated, Eric
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "tb at flashstudy.de" <tb at flashstudy.de>
> To: Eric A Louie <elouie at yahoo.com>; Cisco NSP 
> <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Fri, October 26, 2012 10:53:09 AM
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x sub-interfaces
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> this is a switch.
>
> You have to configure a SVI Interface.
>
> conf t
> vlan 55
> int vlan 55
> ip add X.X.x.X
>
>
> if you want to use more vlans on a port you have to use switchport 
> mode trunk and you should remobe the comannd switchport access vlan 55.
>
> Regards
> Thomas
>
>> Are sub-interfaces supported on the ME3600x?  Or is there some 
>> special formula
>
>> that I need to enable them?
>>
>> Cisco IOS Software, ME360x Software (ME360x-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 
>> 15.2(4)S, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) License Level: AdvancedMetroIPAccess 
>> License Type: Permanent
>>
>> interface GigabitEthernet0/1
>>  no switchport
>>  ip address 192.168.111.2 255.255.255.0 !
>> interface GigabitEthernet0/2
>>  description test interface
>>  switchport access vlan 55
>>  switchport mode trunk
>>
>> me3600-2(config)#int g0/1.1
>>                       ^
>> % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
>>
>> me3600-2(config)#int g0/2.1
>>                       ^
>> % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  Much appreciated, Eric
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/