[c-nsp] MSDP and my limited knowledge question

Paul Cosgrove paul.cosgrove.lists at gmail.com
Mon Sep 3 17:06:55 EDT 2012


Oops think i misread there... thought you were fixing it with a static to
the interface (a method which it just occurred to me may not work). Your
indirect static means the c4900 RP will not be DR. If you are using a
router as a test source, with no other intermediate router acting as DR,
adding the RP definition to that is worth a try but may not help if the SRC
IP is local . The source IP will probably need to be within a connected
range of the incoming interface for the register to be sent.
On 3 Sep 2012 21:18, "Paul Cosgrove" <paul.cosgrove.lists at gmail.com> wrote:

> Msdp source active messages are sent to peers in response to pim registers
> the router receives.
>
> Pim registers are the responsibility of the DR on the same subnet as the
> source.
>
> When you have the static route the c4900 sees the source as directly
> attached, making it both the RP and the DR responsible for sending the
> registers (to itself). Without the static route the router receives the
> data stream, but doesn't know that it should be the router advertising it
> to the RP, and the RP doesn't know the stream originates in its domain.
>
> Paul.
> On 3 Sep 2012 20:55, "David Prall" <dcp at dcptech.com> wrote:
>
>> PIM is running between the two systems or you have a static mroute
>> configured. What does "sh ip rpf 10.10.10.1"
>>
>> David
>>
>> --
>> http://dcp.dcptech.com
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mihai Tanasescu [mailto:mihai at duras.ro]
>> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 3:32 PM
>> To: David Prall
>> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MSDP and my limited knowledge question
>>
>> On 9/3/12 9:02 PM, David Prall wrote:
>> > You're using a GLOP group, so you are AS number 57370?
>> >
>> > You do have "ip pim rp-address 192.168.1.2" configured? I am assuming
>> the
>> > 192.168.1.2 is the MSDP source-address and the BGP source-address.
>> Yes, that's configured.
>> This issue only happens when that subnet is not directly connected on
>> the interface toward the source and when I have a static route toward it.
>> I can also see that my source is sending the stream (it is a Linux that
>> I use for testing and as such I can easily do a tcpdump).
>>
>> >
>> > David
>> >
>> > --
>> > http://dcp.dcptech.com
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> > [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mihai Tanasescu
>> > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2012 2:13 PM
>> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> > Subject: [c-nsp] MSDP and my limited knowledge question
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I have a simple test setup where I'm most likely failing to do something
>> > right.
>> >
>> > It basically looks like this:
>> >
>> > My PC --- CPE --- L3 transport network not under my control  -- their
>> > router (MSDP + BGP + RP here) ---- ( MSDP+ BGP + RP here) C4900
>> > (192.168.1.1) -- (192.168.1.2) - multicast source (S)
>> >
>> > I announce (and originate on the C4900) through BGP the multicast
>> > sources subnet let's call it: 10.10.10.0/29 which I send to my provider
>> > (along with the RP/MSDP IP).
>> > MSDP peers are up, everything seems ok.
>> >
>> > a) if I put the 10.10.10.0/29 class as directly connected (between
>> C4900
>> > and S) instead of the 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.2 from above -> all
>> > works ok and I can view the stream on my PC with VLC.
>> >
>> > I also see:
>> >
>> > (10.10.10.1, 233.224.26.1), 00:00:09/00:02:58, flags: PTA
>> >     Incoming interface: GigabitEthernet1/48, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
>> >     Outgoing interface list: Null
>> >
>> > b) if I put:
>> > 10.10.10.1/29 or /32 configured on S on a Loopback interface
>> > and on C4900:
>> > ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.240 192.168.1.2
>> >
>> > then I only have:
>> >
>> > (10.10.10.1, 233.224.26.1), 00:00:05/00:02:57, flags: PT
>> >     Incoming interface: GigabitEthernet1/48, RPF nbr 192.168.1.2
>> >     Outgoing interface list: Null
>> >
>> > the A flag - MSDP Adv candidate is missing
>> > and if I do a: show ip msdp peer <peer ip> advertise-sa, then I see
>> nothing.
>> >
>> > What am I missing ?
>> > Am I running into any check that I am failing ?
>> >
>> > Can you help me out ?
>> > This subject is quite new to me.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Mihai
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list