[c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000

Tom Storey tom at snnap.net
Sat Apr 6 15:48:24 EDT 2013


It would be worth asking your colleague what wavelength or frequency
"channel 35" is, and make sure your optics are tuned to that, rather than a
"channel number" which can be anything from make to make of DWDM system.


On 3 April 2013 20:20, Aaron <aaron1 at gvtc.com> wrote:

> Yes
>
>
>
> I'm feel like up'ing to sev2 and getting live hand-off
>
>
>
> the tac eng recommended trying a different port on asr9k.  you think that's
> what it is ?
>
>
>
> Aaron
>
>
>
> From: Aaron [mailto:dudepron at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 11:16 AM
> To: Aaron
> Cc: Mohacsi Janos; cisco-nsp
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000
>
>
>
> Have you opened up a case with TAC?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Aaron <aaron1 at gvtc.com> wrote:
>
> I tried, still same one-way arp.  Also removed the dwdm equipment this
> morning....now it's direct fiber and still same one-way arp seen....
>
> Does this look weird that one says "10G-TUNABLE-by-WAVELENGTH" and the
> other
> one does not?
>
>
> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k-1#sh controller dwdm 0/0/0/0 | in Optics
>          Optics Type:  10G-TUNABLE-by-CHANNEL, 10G-TUNABLE-by-WAVELENGTH,
>
> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k-2#sh controller dwdm 0/1/0/1 | in Optics
>          Optics Type:  10G-TUNABLE-by-CHANNEL,
>
>
>
> Also saw something in a cisco document that showed the "network port id"
> number was different then the "network connection id" ...is it supposed to
> be different ?
>
>
> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k-1#sh run controller dwdm 0/0/0/0
> controller dwdm0/0/0/0
>  wavelength frequency 19350
>  network connection id 0/0/0/0
>  network port id 0/0/0/0
>  admin-state in-service
>
> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k-2#sh run controller dwdm 0/1/0/1
> controller dwdm0/1/0/1
>  wavelength frequency 19350
>  network connection id 0/1/0/1
>  network port id 0/1/0/1
>  admin-state in-service
>
>
> Aaron
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mohacsi Janos [mailto:mohacsi at niif.hu]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 4:20 AM
> To: Aaron
> Cc: 'Pshem Kowalczyk'; 'cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net'
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000
>
> Hi Aaron,
>         Can you try configuring the DWDM channel with frequency, instead of
> channel. We run into a similar problem a while ago. Solution was to
> configure with frequency.
>         Best Regards,
>
> Janos Mohacsi
> Head of HBONE+ project
> Network Engineer, Director Network and Multimedia NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
> Co-chair of Hungarian IPv6 Forum Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F
> 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
>
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Aaron wrote:
>
> > Running ios xr 4.1.2
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pshem Kowalczyk [mailto:pshem.k at gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 3:58 PM
> > To: Aaron
> > Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000
> >
> > If the filters only allow channel 35 that's what the optics should be
> tuned to. I'm not sure how to verify that, since clearly you set the
> channel
> and yet the show commands do not confirm that.
> > All that comes to mind is to confirm the actual frequencies of those
> channels on the DWDM filters (we've encountered some incompatibilities with
> Ericsson OTN equipment - their bands didn't always exactly aligned with ITU
> channels).
> >
> > What software version are you running on those ASR9k?
> >
> > kind regards
> > Pshem
> >
> >
> > On 3 April 2013 09:50, Aaron <aaron1 at gvtc.com> wrote:
> >> I just checked this with my collegue...
> >>
> >> The link from 9k to 9k passes through dwdm filters which filter on
> >> channel 35
> >>
> >> We pad that link and get around -12 to -15
> >>
> >> What do you think about all this ?
> >>
> >> Aaron
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Pshem Kowalczyk [mailto:pshem.k at gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 3:16 PM
> >> To: Aaron
> >> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm not sure if this is relevant, but channel 53 is 194.55THz and
> 1540.95nm (see here:
> >>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps5455/data_sheet_78-4585
> <
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps5455/data_sheet_78-458
> 530.html>
> 30.html).
> >>
> >> 193 THz is channel 22 and 1549.315nm is in fact channel 32. Output on
> both routers shows the same values, so perhaps they do tune the optics the
> same way. Is this a direct fibre, or does it go through some other
> equipment? Also - what's the light budget of the link?
> >>
> >> kind regards
> >> Pshem
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3 April 2013 07:24, Aaron <aaron1 at gvtc.com> wrote:
> >>> Opps, I added those dots "..."
> >>>
> >>> It looks like this...
> >>>
> >>> 9k-1 -
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Optics Status
> >>>
> >>>          Optics Type:  10G-TUNABLE-by-CHANNEL,
> >>> 10G-TUNABLE-by-WAVELENGTH,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 9k-2 -
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Optics Status
> >>>
> >>>          Optics Type:  10G-TUNABLE-by-CHANNEL,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 1:12 PM
> >>> To: 'Mikael Abrahamsson'
> >>> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000
> >>>
> >>> Interesting, look what I just saw while comparing....  is this
> significant?
> >>>
> >>> 9k-1...
> >>>
> >>> Optics Status
> >>>
> >>>          Optics Type:  10G-TUNABLE-by-CHANNEL,
> >>> 10G-TUNABLE-by-WAVELENGTH, ...
> >>>
> >>> 9k-2...
> >>>
> >>> Optics Status
> >>>
> >>>          Optics Type:  10G-TUNABLE-by-CHANNEL, ...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 12:57 PM
> >>> To: 'Mikael Abrahamsson'
> >>> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k-1#show controller dwdm 0/0/0/0 Tue Apr  2
> >>> 12:57:25.697 CDT
> >>>
> >>> Port dwdm0/0/0/0
> >>>
> >>> Controller State: up
> >>>
> >>> Transport Admin State: In Service
> >>>
> >>> Loopback: None
> >>>
> >>> G709 Status
> >>>
> >>>          G709 Disabled
> >>> Connectivity Info
> >>>
> >>>                 Network Port ID:  0/0/0/0
> >>>                 Network Connection ID:  0/0/0/0
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Optics Status
> >>>
> >>>          Optics Type:  10G-TUNABLE-by-CHANNEL,
> 10G-TUNABLE-by-WAVELENGTH,
> >>>          Wavelength Info: C-Band, MSA ITU Channel=53,
> >>> Frequency=193.00THz, Wavelength=1549.315nm
> >>>          TX Power = 0.47 dBm
> >>>          RX Power = -16.81 dBm
> >>> TDC Info
> >>>
> >>>         TDC Not Supported on the Plim
> >>>
> >>> Network SRLG values:
> >>>
> >>>         Not Configured
> >>>
> >>> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k-1#
> >>>
> >>> ********************************************************************
> >>> *
> >>> *
> >>> *****
> >>>
> >>> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k-2#show controller dwdm 0/1/0/1 Tue Apr  2
> >>> 12:55:29.783 CDT
> >>>
> >>> Port dwdm0/1/0/1
> >>>
> >>> Controller State: up
> >>>
> >>> Transport Admin State: In Service
> >>>
> >>> Loopback: None
> >>>
> >>> G709 Status
> >>>
> >>>          G709 Disabled
> >>> Connectivity Info
> >>>
> >>>                 Network Port ID:  0/1/0/1
> >>>                 Network Connection ID:  0/1/0/1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Optics Status
> >>>
> >>>          Optics Type:  10G-TUNABLE-by-CHANNEL,
> >>>          Wavelength Info: C-Band, MSA ITU Channel=53,
> >>> Frequency=193.00THz, Wavelength=1549.315nm
> >>>          TX Power = 0.41 dBm
> >>>          RX Power = -16.02 dBm
> >>> TDC Info
> >>>
> >>>         TDC Not Supported on the Plim
> >>>
> >>> Network SRLG values:
> >>>
> >>>         Not Configured
> >>>
> >>> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k-2#
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swmike at swm.pp.se]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 11:38 AM
> >>> To: Aaron
> >>> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Aaron wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Any assistance is appreciated
> >>>
> >>> "show controller dwdm 0/0/0/0" both ends.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list