[c-nsp] uRPF Core Internet Routers
Dobbins, Roland
rdobbins at arbor.net
Tue Apr 16 23:45:20 EDT 2013
On Apr 17, 2013, at 9:37 AM, Lee wrote:
> Seems to me that the utility of filtering just packets supposedly coming from unannounced IPv4 address space is not all that useful in
My reply included both loose-check and strict-check.
> If someone is going to spoof traffic, it's no harder for them to spoof traffic from advertised than non-advertised space.
Sure - but allocated <> advertised, non-allocated <> not advertised.
Loose-check uRPF also is a prerequisite for S/RTBH.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.
-- John Milton
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list