[c-nsp] BGP Signalled VPLS

[Bruce Pinsky]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> While we are on the topic what do you folks think about BGP signaled VPLS
> please? 
> While I would prefer BGP in favor of LDP signaling as I believe it saves
> control plane overhead (1 BGP session VS n-1 LDP sessions), I have heard a
> valid objection as to why to run yet another functionality/feature (not
> tested by majority of operators) when the reliable and stable LDP
> functionality is enabled already anyways (for p2p PWs and base MPLS). 
> 

eVPN will be based on BGP.

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-03
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-evpn-04


- -- 
=========
bep

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlF1bdEACgkQE1XcgMgrtybGSQCgg8B7+XXk3MfUuJlPNSVvOBZF
OCoAoPKLIfDDbBeSClwQxyMPQwqj8Gq7
=Lnj8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----