[c-nsp] ASR1002-X vs ASR9001

[Mark Tinka]

On Friday, April 26, 2013 05:25:30 PM Drew Weaver wrote:

> The MX80 has done everything we've needed it to do; you
> just get there in a different way.

We've ordered and deployed the MX80's more often because the 
local Cisco partner is about higher margin or nothing at 
all. Don't get it... I've never been about repeat-business 
just because - every order on its own merits, regardless of 
size or historical purchases.

Trying different Cisco partners now.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130806/719390cb/attachment.sig>