[c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ?

Adam Vitkovsky adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk
Wed Aug 21 04:54:44 EDT 2013


And I assume no BPDUs are passed either. 
Is it possible to issue cmd: "l2protocol peer" or all the l2protocol commands are rejected altogether? 
Just to see if the L2protocol status changes somehow. 

adam
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Russell [mailto:chris at nifry.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 10:34 AM
To: Adam Vitkovsky
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] VPLS ASR1k - ME3800 - no L2 tunnelling ?

On 21/08/2013 09:29, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> Would you please try to remove the "encapsulation untagged" from the 
> efp 100 on ASR whether it makes any difference?

Hi Adam

  No difference:

DC#show ethernet service instance id 100 interface gig0/0/7 detail Service Instance ID: 100 Service Instance Type: static Associated Interface: GigabitEthernet0/0/7 Associated EVC:
L2protocol drop
CE-Vlans:
Encapsulation: dot1q 1-4094 vlan protocol type 0x8100 Interface Dot1q Tunnel Ethertype: 0x8100
State: Up

Thanks

Chris








More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list