[c-nsp] 6500, 7600 or ASR
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Thu Aug 29 08:30:01 EDT 2013
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:49:06PM +1000, Andrew Miehs wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 8:34 PM, CiscoNSP List <cisconsp_list at hotmail.com>wrote:
>
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 06:58:17PM +1030, CiscoNSP List wrote:
> > > > Have the following requirements:
> > > > Fully redundant, dual power, dual supervisor, multiple line cards for
> > > > redundancy
> > >
> > > How many ports of which types?
> >
> >
> > Only a few gig-e ports.
> >
> >
> In that case, you may even be okay with a ASR1001 - they are much
> cheaper...
ASR1001 has no redundancy except power.
Deploying a pair of ASR1001 might be an option, depending on the
integration scenario and would provide higher availability and
fault isolation than a fully redundant system.
Best regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list