[c-nsp] Reasons for "random" ISIS flapping?

[Mark Tinka]

On Thursday, August 29, 2013 03:54:47 PM Pete Lumbis wrote:

> I don't want to confuse aggressive IGP hellos with
> aggressive  IGP protocol tuning. I'm all for tuning SPF,
> et al. timers under the protocol. It's the only way you
> get fast convergence. My beef is with sub-second hellos,
> which BFD does a better job of.

Yes, agree - BFD takes care of the Hellos.

Any thoughts of dumping BFD in favour of (r)LFA?

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130829/f6ee5b5f/attachment.sig>