[c-nsp] 6500, 7600 or ASR

[Mark Tinka]

On Friday, August 30, 2013 09:40:32 AM Gert Doering wrote:

> I was thinking about ASR9k, which have EIGRP, and a
> modular OS :-)

Ah, I thought you were done with Cisco :-).

> (But then, moving from EIGRP somewhere else would not be
> hard, and maybe I'll do it anyway one day... it's really
> just a matter of personal taste, and debugging - and
> debugging EIGRP is way more straightforward than OSPF -
> partially because it's easier for a distance-vector
> protocol, partially due to much more experience on my
> side...)

Well, if you ever had to switch IGP's, I'd certainly suggest 
IS-IS instead of OSPF :-).

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130830/86f27edc/attachment.sig>