[c-nsp] C6500 IPv6 redistribute with route-map?

[Mark Tinka]

On Thursday, December 12, 2013 10:30:06 AM Adam Vitkovsky 
wrote:

> And here I would object that with PIC-Core and PIC-Edge
> BGP is as fast as OSPF/ISIS doing IP FRR.

I have seen extraordinary BGP performance in modern code in 
IOS and Junos, particularly in NG-MVPN scenarios where BGP 
is handling PIM messages.

BGP PIC, Next Hop Addressing Tracking and Fast Fallover have 
all improved BGP performance to the point where it doesn't 
matter that much.

Perhaps, some day, when I'm really lazy, I'll work on some 
empirical data for various scenarios.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20131212/512d657b/attachment.sig>