[c-nsp] vs isis routing levels

[Patrick M. Hausen]

Hi, all,

Am 20.12.2013 um 14:58 schrieb Arne Larsen / Region Nordjylland <arla at rn.dk>:
> We are planning to resign our enterprise environment.
> It's based on Cisco boxes running isis level1-2 routes
> Would you keep this or would you make all level-2 routes.

If your network is small enough to call for a single area, go all level-2.

For the reason look here:
http://blog.ipspace.net/2011/11/multi-level-is-is-in-single-area-think.html

HTH
Patrick
-- 
punkt.de GmbH * Kaiserallee 13a * 76133 Karlsruhe
Tel. 0721 9109 0 * Fax 0721 9109 100
info at punkt.de       http://www.punkt.de
Gf: Jürgen Egeling      AG Mannheim 108285



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20131220/208bdee1/attachment.sig>