[c-nsp] vs isis routing levels

[Mark Tinka]

On Friday, December 20, 2013 11:25:16 PM Saku Ytti wrote:

> I think SR in XR will ship RSN(tm), so maybe 3 years is
> bit too conservative. But in multivendor network not so
> much.

Yes, mine is a multi-vendor network, always, as you know 
:-).

For example, Juniper's recommended rLFA solution is across 
an RSVP-TE tunnel, while Cisco implement it over an 
automatically-provisioned T-LDP tunnel. I've asked Juniper 
to consider the T-LDP approach, as RSVP-TE requires more 
manual work.

So I'd need to give the code some time to settle down 
between both vendors.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20131221/a0259e4c/attachment.sig>