[c-nsp] MPLS/VPN Loadbalancing with 2 CPE routers
Chris Stand
cstand141 at gmail.com
Sat Dec 21 07:38:12 EST 2013
Is there "too much" traffic on one leg ? Does PE2 & PE1 connect into the
same provider cloud or are they different ( orange, AT&T ).
I think maybe you might need to let PE1 and PE2 talk directly to each other
and if you do not care about BGP/AS paths ( I analyzed the paths of close
to 500K remote networks from our 2 different service provider BGP feeds [
since converted to default as there was no gain; everybody talks to
everybody and TATA talks to the rest ] and statistically they were the
same) ... just make both of them learn a default route from their next hops
and handle the link1, link2, link1, link2 route that way.
??
> Message: 8
> Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 06:10:51 -0600
> From: Chris Stand <cstand141 at gmail.com>
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] MPLS/VPN Loadbalancing with 2 CPE routers
> Message-ID:
> <
> CAJYExY8jYuavV3Gd3G9f6SsbAvSS4CYJw89nJ+ewUMep4_1o2g at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Bonjour,
>
> I do not know your exact topology well enough, but could you run GLBP on
> a vlan that goes through the L3 switch ( I am not aware of a switch that
> ONLY does L3 and does not allow you to pass L2 through at the same time. I
> do GLBP on 7K & VSS links that run through other 6500s.
>
> Or, again not being fully knowledgeable on your network , could you do 2
> HSRP groups on the LAN and use both default gateways at the same time on
> devices that point to the existing HSRP ".1"
>
> If you have not done this before you make routerA active in group1, standby
> in group2; routerB standby in group1, active in group2.
>
>
>
> Message: 10
> > Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:35:43 +0100
> > From: Nicolas KARP <liste at karp.fr>
> > To: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> > Subject: [c-nsp] MPLS/VPN Loadbalancing with 2 CPE routers
> > Message-ID:
> > <
> > CAELGAXcJQ1EEnLEcZaUsy-EWDsMFZRT+00KKnPu2jEte+4ogRQ at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > We have a customer who has 2 CPE routers. We have 2 uplinks, the first
> one
> > attached to the first router CPE1, the second one attached to the second
> > router CPE2.
> >
> > We have ebgp configured with 2 different PE's and IBGP between the CPE's.
> > HSRP is configured on the LAN. Unfortunately, we can't use GLBP because
> > there is a L3 switch behind the CPE's.
> >
> > How can we achieve the loadbalancing between the 2 links ?
> >
> > PE1 PE2
> > | |
> > | |
> > ebgp ebgp
> > | |
> > | |
> > CE1 --Ibgp--- CE2
> >
> >
> > Thanks and Best Regards,
> >
> > # - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> - -
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> > # - - Nicolas KARP
> > # - - Network and Security Engineer
> > # - - Email : liste at karp.fr <nicolas at karp.fr>
> > # - - Linkedin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/nicolaskarp
> > # - - Viadeo : http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/nicolas.karp
> > <http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/nicolas.karp%20>
> > # - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> - -
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list