[c-nsp] Sup2T interface ACL limitations

Dobbins, Roland rdobbins at arbor.net
Sat Dec 21 23:09:27 EST 2013


On Dec 22, 2013, at 7:52 AM, Łukasz Bromirski <lukasz at bromirski.net> wrote:

> ACLs are good for basic sanity checks and segmenting the traffic for ports (L4+). BGP scales way better for L3 than them and it’s faster
> and way easier to dynamically update the entries.

Concur 100%.

ACLs are a network access policy enforcement tool.

S/RTBH is a DDoS reaction/mitigation tool.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

	  Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.

		       -- John Milton




More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list