[c-nsp] MPLS TE explicit-path: secondary ip as next-address

[Artyom Viklenko]

05.02.2013 13:08, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) пишет:
>
> On 05/02/2013 11:03, "Artyom Viklenko" <artem at viklenko.net> wrote:
>
>> 05.02.2013 10:30, sthaug at nethelp.no пишет:
>>>> New ip addresses was configured as secondary on interfaces in question.
>>>> These new subnets (/30) appear in routing table, cef, etc. Network
>>>> statement also was added to ospf configuration.
>>>
>>> Note that it at least *used* to be the case that OSPF wouldn't form
>>> adjacencies over secondary addresses. I don't know if this limitation
>>> still holds, but it could be relevant to your case.
>>>
>>
>> […]
>>
>> But it doesn't in  output of 'show mpls traffic-eng topology' like any
>> other secondary subnets. This lead to errors establishing path.
>
> indeed, that's the reason CSPF won't find a path when you reference the
> secondary in the path.. Don't think you can add those to the topology, so
> the only approach would be to work with alternate path options and
> re-oprtimization which would use a temporary path around the links you're
> migrating.
> Or maybe you don't have that much traffic during low-peak hours that you
> could do away without the tunnels when you change the links?
>

I see. Now I'm thinking off two options:

1. Create new parallel links (vlans) with new ips.
2. Re-number existing vlans at night and rebuild tunnels.

Thanks a lot to all!


-- 
Sincerely yours,
  Artyom Viklenko.