[c-nsp] ASR-100x intro

[Nikolay Shopik]

data sheet clear about this -  1,000,000 IPv4 or 1,000,000 IPv6 routes.
That's FIB, and we currently have about 440K routes. You only need more
RAM with many full-view feeds.

1002-X ESP40 has lower values because it can only handle 36Gbit, you
can't physically install more then 3x10Gbit interfaces, So 3x10gbit +
6x1Gbe onboard = 36Gbit.

RP limitation is only cpu power and ram (amount of full feeds). As some
presentation PDFs says RP2 can handle 25M as route reflector.

ESP is limited amount routes can be installed in FIB.

ASR1001 is have dual-core CPU 2.2Ghz, others have RP1 based on freescale
CPU.

You need at least 8Gb memory if you run more then 2 full bgp feeds
and/or software redudancy. I even suggest to maxout to 16Gb. Half of
memory will be available for platform only not IOS process.

Most info comes from presentation unfortunately its Russian.
http://www.ciscoexpo.ru/club/sites/default/files/seminar_attachments/anidlis.asr_.1000.archtecture.v0.4.pdf

On 07/02/13 06:12, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> On Jan 16, 2013, at 2:41 AM, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> 
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps9343/data_sheet_c78-450070.html
>>
>> cisco.com/go/asr1000 -> data sheets -> Embedded Services Processors Data
>> Sheet
>>
>> ASR1002-X essentially tightly packeted ESP40+RP2 into 2U.
> 
> Sorry to drag this thread back from the dead, but we're not big enough to merit attention from the Cisco sales boys, so we have to actually put some effort into giving them money.  And the integrators we're dealing with (both for Cisco and Juniper) don't seem to really know which parts go with which…  One gave us a quote for a Juniper MX5 and an ASR-1002 (not X) with no ESP and presented it as if the ASR-1002 could do something without an ESP module installed.
> 
> That said, "ASR1002-X essentially tightly packeted ESP40+RP2 into 2U" has me confused.  I'm looking at the first URL noted above (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps9343/data_sheet_c78-450070.html), and while the "integrated" ESP on the 1002-X seems to almost match the ESP-40 for traffic/Mpps, I see that it can only take 1M IPv4 (or? and? split?) IPv6 routes.  For something we want to keep around for many years, that feels a little bit tight.  We currently take two full views.  I would not be surprised if we ended up with 3-4 full views down the road (both IPv4 and IPv6).  
> 
> What other limitations might these boxes have when running full bgp views?
> 
> What is the relation between the ESP and the number of routes vs. the RP and number of routes?  Datasheets for both ESP and RP have a route limitation.
> 
> Also, looking at the RP datasheet (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps9343/data_sheet_c78-441072.html), it's not clear which RP is included when the RP is integrated (everything below the ASR-1004, yes?).  
> 
> What does more RAM in the RP buy me?
> 
> If I'm reading all these charts right, it looks like the starting point for having more than 1M routes is an ASR-1002 with an ESP-20, correct?
> 
> Computers are hard.  Let's go shopping!  Oh wait, shopping is hard… 
> 
> Thanks all,
> 
> Charles
> 
>>
>> On 16/01/13 11:08, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jan 6, 2013, at 8:14 AM, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
>>>
>>>> ESP5 comes with 512K FIB, while ASR1001 which has also ESP5 integrated
>>>> have 1M FIB.
>>>
>>> I'm still putzing around the Cisco site, where are you finding these detailed specs?  I'm trapped in some link loop that's only giving me the most basic specs…
>>>
>>> And while I'm here, does anyone have any thoughts on the 1002-X?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Charles
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 06.01.2013 16:26, Robert Hass wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Scott Pettit <SPettit at end2end.co.nz> wrote:
>>>>>> Hmm, perhaps I was incorrect - the old ESP2.5 appears to have been made
>>>>>> End of Sale since July 2012.  I just checked our ASR and it's showing 5G
>>>>>> throughput.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #show platform hardware throughput level
>>>>>> The current throughput level is 5000000 kb/s
>>>>>
>>>>> But my question was about FIB capacity not performance.
>>>>>
>>>>> 512K FIB is not very scale for near future as world BGP table is
>>>>> growing all the time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rob
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>
>