[c-nsp] How important is the HW revision of a module?
Pete Lumbis
alumbis at gmail.com
Thu Feb 14 14:10:15 EST 2013
HW Rev numbers are increased anytime anything is changed with regards to
the hardware (layout). If the capacitor was from Vendor A and is not Vendor
B, but it's the same functional capacitor, that's a new revision. If we
move the dimm slot over 0.02mm on the board, that's a new revision.
Generally these changes are made due to logistical reasons (vendor change,
unable to use the same element (e.g., lead) in construction).
If the HW Revision was due to a failure or problem scenario this would be
handled under a field notice. If there was a functional change it would be
a different part (e.g., EARL 7 on sup720 vs. EARL 7.5 on rsp720).
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Jeffrey G. Fitzwater
<jfitz at princeton.edu>wrote:
> How concerned should I be about the HW and FW revisions? 2.2 to 4.3 seems
> pretty far apart.
>
>
>
> Here are two CEF720 24 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6724-SFP modules. One is
> our current running and the other is from used market for lab testing.
>
>
>
> Mod MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw
> Status
>
> USED MARKET for TESTING
> 0013.1972.6828 to 0013.1972.683f 2.2 12.2(14r)S5 12.2(33)SXI7 Ok
>
>
> PRODUCTION
> 8843.e1aa.a5e8 to 8843.e1aa.a5ff 4.3 12.2(18r)S1 12.2(33)SXI7 Ok
>
>
>
> I guess I could ask TAC what the revisions changed or fixed.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
>
>
> Jeff Fitzwater
> OIT Network Systems
> Princeton University
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list