[c-nsp] FW: Cisco blade switch config
Andrew Miehs
andrew at 2sheds.de
Wed Feb 20 12:03:01 EST 2013
Sent from a mobile device
On 21/02/2013, at 8:11, "Kevin Berry" <kevin.berry.70 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, I am aware. My HP simply was configured something like:
>
> Config t
> Trunk 21-22 trk1 lacp
> Trunk 37-38 trk2 lacp
> Exit
>
> Then I made sure that those trunks were TAGGED for each VLAN.
>
> The HP switch, appears correct. I believe, even by review
> Then for Cisco, I built Etherchannel LACP from ports. My etherchannel
> summary now shows
> that gi 0/20 & 0/22 are in use and bundled in port channel. So that seems
> fine.
> My etherchannel for those ports was built for channel 1, or PO1. Config
> reads:
>> interface Port-channel1
>> description HP CORE
>> switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-3,100
>> switchport mode trunk
>> spanning-tree portfast trunk
>> spanning-tree vlan 4-99 cost 20
>> !
>> interface GigabitEthernet0/1
>> switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-3,100
>> switchport mode trunk
>> speed 1000
>> channel-group 1 mode active
>> spanning-tree portfast
>> !
>> interface GigabitEthernet0/2
>> switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-3,100
>> switchport mode trunk
>> speed 1000
>> channel-group 1 mode active
>> spanning-tree portfast
>
You original show etherchannel had too many ports in the portchannel. Have you fixed this yet?
> Now, this being the case, would you not expect these ports to carry traffic
> on those vlans (1,2,3,100) ?
> If I have a ESX host in gi 0/1 and it has vm's on 2 of those vlans, and 2
> virtual switches are configured, one for each ip segment/vlan, then each VM
> should send traffic to my uplink ports, in this case gi 0/20 & 0/22, which
> will pass all those vlans on to the next switch?
>
> It is odd to me, as port gi 0/1 needs to be able to actually accommodate
> multiple vlans, so to me that would be a trunk. Then, to combine multiple
> ports to move traffic, I need the etherchannel (with LACP talking to the
> HP). It seems this all works fine as long as only 1 vlan is applied. AS soon
> as the expectation is for more than one vlan, it ceases.
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list