[c-nsp] Next step-up from 7206VXR

[Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson]

On 20.2.2013 16:19, "Seth Mattinen" <sethm at rollernet.us> wrote:

>On 2/20/13 6:13 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Mack McBride wrote:
>> 
>>> At 768k you are effectively limiting your IPv6 table to 128k (you
>>> can't really go more than that if you expect to use IPv6). I recommend
>>> a 640k/192k split.
>> 
>> Well, I believe IPv4 will hit 640k before IPv6 will hit 128k, so I'd
>> recommend 768k/128k instead.
>> 
>
>That's what I think too, unless there are too many unchecked idiots that
>decide to deaggregate their /30-32 into /48s.

+1 on this one, this is our configuration as well.

Kind regards,
Sibbi