[c-nsp] Cat 6500 vs ASR

[Raymond Burkholder]

> For reference, I have been saying exactly what everyone here has been
> saying, but my boss wants the specifics :-)

How about www.cisco.com/go/fn

That is the feature navigator.    Other than that, I think you'd have to
find some CiscoLive presentations.  

> 
> 
> 
> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:28:55 -0500
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cat 6500 vs ASR
> From: alumbis at gmail.com
> To: markjohn20 at hotmail.com
> CC: nick at foobar.org; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> 
> I think the problem is that the devil is in the details.
> 
> Both boxes will support most of the same features (VPLS, NAT, Netflow,
> QoS). For every feature listed here there are caveats that need to be kept
in
> mind when comparing the boxes (ex. for NAT 6k punts the first packet to
> built state, ASR1k doesn't. ASR1k will scale to larger NAT table sizes).
> 
> 
> -Pete
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Mark John <markjohn20 at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dear oh dear!
> 
> 
> 
> Yes, admittedly two very different platforms with different core purposes,
> but in term of support for logical features which can be compared side-by-
> side, that's not too difficult if you the info. Some gave an example
earlier of
> support for VPLS, but never mind :-)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:41:40 +0000
> 
> > From: nick at foobar.org
> 
> > To: markjohn20 at hotmail.com
> 
> > CC: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> 
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cat 6500 vs ASR
> 
> >
> 
> > On 17/01/2013 11:56, Mark John wrote:
> 
> > > True. So, ASR 1xxx
> 
> >
> 
> > "Compare two completely different things.  Be specific."
> 
> >
> 
> > Oh my.
> 
> >
> 
> > Nick
> 
> >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> 
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.