[c-nsp] ASA5585-X IPS Upgrade causes ASA failover
Antonio Soares
amsoares at netcabo.pt
Fri Jan 18 14:22:47 EST 2013
Just found that even with a basic configuration change like enabling a
signature, I have a failover... Is this normal ?
Thanks.
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S/SP)
amsoares at netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Antonio Soares
Sent: sexta-feira, 9 de Novembro de 2012 23:56
To: 'Pete Lumbis'
Cc: 'cisco-nsp'
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASA5585-X IPS Upgrade causes ASA failover
Thanks, it seems another enhancement that won't see the light of day...
Found in 8.0.3... Code that has almost 5 years...
Regards,
Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S/SP)
amsoares at netcabo.pt
http://www.ccie18473.net
-----Original Message-----
From: Pete Lumbis [mailto:alumbis at gmail.com]
Sent: sexta-feira, 9 de Novembro de 2012 22:06
To: Antonio Soares
Cc: cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASA5585-X IPS Upgrade causes ASA failover
CSCsm81086 - Allow user to exclude the status of the SSM or SSP from
failover checks
Still in the New state :(
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Antonio Soares <amsoares at netcabo.pt> wrote:
> Hello group,
>
> I had a bad surprise today, I was updating the IPS software of two
> ASA5585-SSP-IPS10 modules and found that it caused the Failover of the
> parent ASA5585-SSP-10. It seems this is the normal behavior
> (https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2035549) but I was not
> expecting this at all. I'm not using any of the SSP-IPS10 interfaces
> thus there is not monitoring on those interfaces so why the hell this
> is like this ? I knew that the IPS upgrade would cause the module
> reload but taking into account what I mentioned, it caught me
> completely by surprise. This should not be a big problem but since I
> have OSPF running on the ASAs, Failover is something that breaks a lot
> of things. No NSF support... :(
>
> Anyone knows if it is possible to disable this behavior, I mean, the
> implicit monitoring of the IPS module ? This is what failover history
> shows
> me:
>
> 18:36:55 WEST Nov 9 2012
> Standby Ready Just Active Service card in
other
> unit has failed
> 18:36:55 WEST Nov 9 2012
> Just Active Active Drain Service card in
other
> unit has failed
> 18:36:55 WEST Nov 9 2012
> Active Drain Active Applying Config Service card in
other
> unit has failed
> 18:36:55 WEST Nov 9 2012
> Active Applying Config Active Config Applied Service card in
other
> unit has failed
> 18:36:55 WEST Nov 9 2012
> Active Config Applied Active Service card in
other
> unit has failed
>
> Is this really the expected behavior ? I'm still trying to find where
> this is documented.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S/SP)
> amsoares at netcabo.pt
> http://www.ccie18473.net
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list