[c-nsp] Port-channel configuration "stickiness"...

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:52:33PM -0500, Jeff Kell wrote:
> Known bug?  Feature?  You can alter a port-channel configuration and
> expect it to propagate to the members, correct?

I'd share that assumption.  If you alter the port-channel config and the
members fall out of sync, it's a catastrophic bug.

(I haven't seen this myself yet, as most of our "many vlans, many changes"
port-channels are on 6500s that are quite well-behaved :-) - and on the 
smaller switches, usually the set of VLANs is fairly static)

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130119/469979c2/attachment.sig>