[c-nsp] unknown interface for ipv6 route in 4.2.3

[Tassos Chatzithomaoglou]

tbh, this is something i didn't even think about...and i don't know why they chose to go
with /48.

https://www.peeringdb.com/private/exchange_view.php?id=347


PS: sorry for the previous "pgp" email.


--
Tassos


Gert Doering wrote on 30/1/2013 21:09:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 08:57:25PM +0200, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
>> Yes, that's the LAN of the local IX.
>>
>> interface TenGigE0/2/0/3.290851
>>  description ** GRIX **
>>  ipv4 address x.x.x.x/24
>>  ipv6 address 2001:648:2100::x/48
> This... is amazing.  And then people complain that a /64 is too big for
> a single LAN.
>
> I'd expect more bugs and unexpected behaviour - implementations get tested
> with "LAN = /64", and sometimes with "/112" or "/124", but I'd expect
> most interesting results for connected networks with shorter masks.
>
> gert