[c-nsp] MPLS down to the CPE

[Mark Tinka]

On Saturday, July 06, 2013 05:16:28 PM Phil Bedard wrote:

> Most of the time these aren't L3 customers it is L2VPN.
> Like an instance doing cell backhaul where a customer
> wants two circuits which take diverse paths around a
> ring. You can do it with G.8032 and different VLANs but
> its somewhat easier using MPLS along with the benefit of
> the 50ms protection RSVP-TE can provide. Or IP FRR If
> you aren't in a ring scenario which breaks it.

Right.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130706/6d04a9a2/attachment.sig>