[c-nsp] MPLS down to the CPE

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Mon Jul 8 05:45:09 EDT 2013


On Monday, July 08, 2013 05:04:18 AM Gordon Smith wrote:

>  I'd be reluctant to expose my control plane out to a
> CPE....
> 
>  To provide redundancy & L2VPN services, LACP + 802.1ad
> would suffice, and would allow you to keep the MPLS
> control plane in equipment you have absolute control
> over i.e. PE routers.

Preaching to the choir.

The problem is, in our case, customers didn't want to pay 
for the 2nd link. It wasn't a technical problem, although it 
sought a technical solution.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130708/97a1c258/attachment.sig>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list